Negative News Articles Examples

Sensational news seems to be a ubiquitous element of modern news. In fact, this seems to be a requirement that most media outlets demand of their journalists! As Tom Stafford wrote in an excellent article on the subject published on the BBC in 2014, “Our attraction to bad news can be more complex than mere journalistic cynicism or hunger that springs from the darkness within.” This shows why the focus is on the negative. You just need to know what is that ingredient in your donuts that makes thousands of people homeless. Knowing that your snack puts people at risk is an immediate call to action, and as such, you need to react immediately. Of course, with a click on the article. “Basically, we don`t think the U.S. mainstream media reports fake news,” he says, “but we think they`re more likely to report negative news and focus on negative news.” So what do you want to hear first, the good news or the bad news? Well, apparently, it`s an easy choice for most of us, and the bad news comes to the top. When the vaccine rollout began, which was “great news,” he said, media networks sometimes raised “unnecessary reservations” and “excessively negative.” This included a focus on new variants of the virus and vaccine side effects. Have you ever noticed how many negative messages are shared daily? It has been proven that people prefer negative news to positive stories.

News agencies are businesses. You have to sell stories to survive and compete with thousands of competing news companies. This terrible saying is one of the most common in the media world. This is the influence behind negative headlines. Like many Americans at the beginning of the pandemic, Sacerdote was stuck at home, watching the news more than usual. He found it “depressing,” he says, and found that the more his eyes stuck to the news, the more he realized the media was reporting on COVID-19 in “the worst possible way.” At a time when most people needed to hear something positive, the American media focused instead on the negative. And unfortunately, the good news just doesn`t sell. If you doubt it, just look at the actions of the Russian news site, which tried to deviate from negative news and lost two-thirds of its readers in the process. “Thus, a perverse incentive may have arisen in which news organizations, measured by the greater reach/popularity of their articles with negative/emotional headlines, began to drift toward an increasing use of negative feelings/emotions in their headlines,” the researchers theorize. As you can probably see from the underlying theme of most of the information described here, negative news is a technical device. It has been proven that bad news sells. As humans, we tend to choose negative information over positive information.

It`s an oddity of our ancestors – who must have been aware of all the potential threats to their survival – that we always carry with us. They found that coverage of the pandemic in the U.S. was “shockingly negative” and darker than in international media or scientific journals, Spriestdote says. One newspaper in particular learned the hard way about the public`s appetite for bad news. A Russia-based publication reported nothing but good news for an entire day, putting a positive spin on all its stories, such as “No disruption on the roads despite snow.” The result? The newspaper lost two-thirds of its readership in a single day. Bad news sells. Good news, not so much. Good news is moving at a snail`s pace compared to bad news. For our ancestors to survive, they had to focus on the negative news around them. Whether it`s an impending storm, an impending predator, or anything else posing a threat, any negativity could have been life-threatening. Imagine you`ve seen two news articles.

The first headline was: “The weather is nice today!” While the second announced that a dark storm was approaching you. Which one would you click on? The report “News, Politics and Negativity” highlights the benefits of evolution. After recording the physiological responses, sweating performance, and heart rate of people who saw informational material, the study found that negative news attracted attention and elicited a strong response, while positive news had almost no reaction. This was to be expected: responding to stimuli that could pose a danger is a survivability, and in an information-saturated world, we must be able to separate the important from the down. Sacerdote does not suggest that journalists present false or factually false reports. He believes that by focusing on the negative, the media does not present the whole picture. About 87% of Covid coverage in the U.S. national media last year was negative. The share was 51% in international media, 53% in US regional media and 64% in scientific journals. Thanks to less responsiveness to positive stories and a higher level of engagement and reaction to negative news, statistics and other exaggerated media content. When they hear bad news, most people react or act.

They tend to have an increased state of perception of this news. The neural network also detected drastic increases in specific negative emotions during the study period. Some 87% of coverage of the pandemic in national media and 53% in regional media was extremely negative, according to media statistics. According to negative statistics, preteens (aged 10 to 12 years) are more susceptible to this adverse effect. 45% of them report feeling bad after watching the news, compared to 31% of teens (aged 13 to 18). Exposure – repeatedly and even accidentally – to negative news can increase internal stress and trigger anxiety, as negative news statistics show. Negativity bias is the tendency to pay much more attention to negative details than positive details. This is different from confirmation bias, where we tend to selectively look at information or see information that confirms our pre-existing ideas. This is all well and good, except that our already existing ideas are generally negative and so we reaffirm our negative expectations. A trio of New Zealand researchers used a network of neural “transformers” to analyze the emotional mood of 23 million internet titles published between 2000 and 2019 by 47 of the most popular news media in the United States. The sites come from the AllSides media bias board, which categorizes popular media sources by ideology.

The places represent a cross-section of American political views, from the far left to the far right and everything in between. The study found that nearly 90 percent of articles from major U.S. news outlets were negative, compared to only 50 percent to 60 percent from major international media outlets, he said. For example, the mainstream media refused to talk about how some countries managed to stop the spread of the pandemic. Even after Pfizer`s COVID-19 vaccine proved effective, more than 80% of pandemic-related news still had a negative bias. Second, negative statistics show that bad news can grab readers` attention. Once on this proverbial hook, a reader can be swayed in the direction the journalist wants. The whole process is like a sleight of hand, but with messages as opposed to a magic trick. When we identify something negative, we are attracted to it.

We are forced to unravel the mystery and gain knowledge about negative things. In the world of online reputation management, this means that we tend to click on things that are negative. This drives traffic, which increases the negative in search results. The higher the negative increase in search results, the more people click, which reinforces the negative. It`s a diabolical cycle that combines human behavior with Google to make search results more negative than they should be. This is exactly why the media prints negative news – the public buys it. But he wasn`t sure his perception was correct. To verify this, he began collaborating with two other researchers and building a database of Covid coverage of all the major networks, CNN, Fox News, Politico, The New York Times and hundreds of other sources in the US and abroad. The researchers then analyzed it using a social science technique that classifies language as positive, neutral, or negative. The content of the negative news sells, so of course, the newspaper opted for the former. Regardless of whether the world really gets worse or not, the nature of the news will make us think it`s a clickbaitbath that wasn`t invented by BuzzFeed.

He`s been there since the morning hours of the news. We won`t even go into comparing what a good or bad clickbait is, because every clickbait is negative because it makes you react to the message with much higher expectations. Most journalists cite Nielsen`s ratings as the main reason the reports are sensationalist or simply inaccurate. News is about things that happen, not things that don`t happen. We never see a journalist say to the camera, “I`m reporting live from a country where no war has broken out” – or from a city that hasn`t been bombed, or a school that hasn`t exploded. Until the bad things disappear from the face of the earth, there will always be enough incidents to fill the news, especially when billions of smartphones turn most of the world`s population into criminal journalists and war correspondents. According to the neural network, an example of a strongly positive headline was: “The best new movies and TV shows on Netflix, Amazon and more in 2019.” An example of a strongly negative headline was: “Warning about online fictitious election results”. If we constantly tell a negative story, we don`t give our audience the most accurate picture of reality.